Last thursday I was in court. I sued a lady / ‘transman’ / ‘non-binary’ for libelling me on @LinkedIn and @instagram. The demands we had in court where to remove all slanderous posts from social media and to post a rectification. And for the future to not write about me ever again. Stop the digital pillory.
She served as prosector, judge and executioner all at once. The digital pillory was put in place.
She was handing out the eggs to her connections. Saying my worldview is so despicable that they should warn their connections to tell them: “She dedicates her life to dehumanise transpeople.” And to urge them to break their cionnections with me and in their turn warn their mutual connections wit me to break contact too.
Unfit
She also accused me of being an ableist and a racist and some other unfunded deep insults and claimed that because of this I was unfit as a coach.
Isolate
She wanted everybody to know about it. She wants to isolate me, so my company will go bankrupt.
Warfare
This illustrate that the ‘other side’ sees a lot more tactics applicable in this gender wars: they use personal emotional, reputational and financial warfare against women and supportive men.
Insults
I told the judge that if I laid a path of the offensive tweets that have come in my direction in the seven years that I speak out as the first feminist against transgender ideology in the Netherlands, I could lay it from the tip of the north in Groningen to the south in Limburg.
Personal attack
The personal attack on LinkedIn is of a different order. It is directly aiming at my business and as I am a selfemployed breadwinner, this is becoming a sort of existence-threatening.
This has to stop.
I need to act and stop it.
Non-debate
Three things happened in court that I want to reflect upon as they are characteristic for the whole gender-non-debate:
1. Pronoun pushing.
2. Vicious ungrounded personal attack to avoid debate.
3. Just repeat what TERFS say, is enough proof of their desinformation.
1. Pronoun-pushing
As I am in the habit of correctly sexing people, I addressed the transactivist as ‘she’ and ‘her’ and got interrupted by her lawyer twice. After the first interaction I bluntly refused to say ‘he’. The judge suggested I used her last name. I agreed to that.
Interruption
But I was really struggling to find a way to describe her and so I used “her” again and interrupted by her lawyer again. But this irritated the judge, because in the Dutch courtroom, interruptions are not allowed. You need to wait until it’s your turn. The judge told them to let me finish my story.
But the pronoun-pushing influenced my emotions and my mind and thus my speech.
Live Action Role Play
When I clearly state that I don’t want to take part in your Live Action Role Play and you still try to push me to collaborate, you do not respect my boundaries at all. You enforce your genderreligion on me.
2. Vicious ungrounded personal attacks instead of countering with arguments
In stead of denying the allegations the lawyer of the slanderer chose to frame me as a bad person spreading the worst kind of desinformation and that would justify the personal attack on me.
Justified
They just continued to behave as activists. The personal attack was justified, they claimed, because the desinformation I spread was incredibly harmful.
The judge asked the activist in court what the consequences of the presumed misinformation where.
She then personally blamed me for
– the decline of acceptance of the LHBTQ community
– the fact that genderdysphoric children are thrown out of their parents homes
– the high suicide-levels of transpeople
All without providing any proof.
Arguments
My brilliant young lawyer Floris Vulto, intervened and said it is this kind of accusations without grounds that we are in court for today. It’s not allowed. It’s a crime to ruin someones reputation. . It’s He also pointed out that just summing up what I have written on social media doesn’t prove that the things I say are ‘desinformation’. Arguments are needed. But then they proved again that they really don’t think any argument is needed.
3. Just repeating what TERFS say, is enough proof of their desinformation.
The lawyer of the person that aims to bring me to bankruptcy because of my despicable views, started to read out loud an article I have written: nine realities of transgenderism. Again as if reading my social media posts out loud is enough proof of their desinformation. My lawyer objected
Even in court they think they are right because in their logic there is only one reality and anyone with a different reality is evil and should be silenced. They are deeply convinced they don’t need any argument at all to back up their claims.
Toddler logic
It’s toddler-logic, embedded in full grown gaslighting.
My lawyer said the accused used the digital pillory to execute a punishment after she first played the role of the public prosecutor and the role of the judge. She deliberately falsely exposes me as a villain and this has to stop. Vulto said someone must have a short circuit in the conscience-department to attack someone so viciously for their point of view.
Freedom of speech
He stated I have freedom of speech in a democratic society and should be able to execute that right without being accused of being a hateful person, and among other strong insults, a racist ánd ableist.
We will have to wait till the 10th of july for the the judicial decision.
The so called ‘harmfull desinformation’ that they where reading out loud:
This was read out in court as if just repeating my words was proof that what I wrote is desinformation.
NINE TRUTHS ABOUT TRANSITION
When it comes to trans care, the truth stays outside the consulting room. That’s why I’m giving you some information here that everyone who transitions should receive.
Truth 1.
People can’t change sex. Others will often always recognize you as your original sex. There’s a good chance that they’ll ‘pretend’ because you don’t find it pathetic to argue with your desire.
The equality is gone from the relationship.
Truth 2.
The operations on genitals are cosmetic and experimental. Which means that you will never actually get the genitals of your desired gender, but a ‘neo-vagina’ or ‘neo-penis’, made by surgeons.
Truth 3.
The ‘neo-vagina’ is an open wound that often stinks (when using intestinal tissue, it stinks of poop). It has to be kept open your entire life. For many men, this turns out to be so painful that they let it close.
Truth 4.
There are few cosmetic surgeries with more complications than making a meat sausage for women who think they can have a man’s genitals. They fall off, urine does not flow through them, women become incontinent.
Truth 5.
The consequences of using testosterone are disastrous for the female body. Women enter menopause 30 years too early, get osteoporosis and their chance of a heart attack increases by 25%. They also go bald extra quickly.
Truth 6.
The consequences of estrogen on a male body have also been made clear by research: men get breast cancer much more often.
Truth 7.
The chance of finding a partner decreases sharply. A homosexual man looks for a man as a partner, a lesbian woman for a woman and heterosexual is looking for someone of the opposite sex. You cannot change the sexual preference of others because you feel you are of a different gender than your actual sex.
Truth 8.
It is for most men and womem absolutely not attractive when a man is so focused on himself and his appearance and needs so much confirmation from outside. That shows an obsessive, dependent and coercive personality.
Truth nine
Regret is much more common than you think. The estimate now is that about a third of people regret taking hormones and/or undergoing operations. So there is a chance of one in three that you will be deeply regretting your transition at some point. Because the consequences cannot be reversed.
Artikel 1 van de grondwet.